Otter.ai logo

Otter.ai

Freemium

AI meeting notes and transcription

4.0
Editorial Rating
Editorial Rating
4/5
Starting Price
Free
Founded
2016
Reviewed by James Crawford·Senior IT & Cybersecurity Leader · 15+ years evaluating enterprise software·Last reviewed:

About Otter.ai

Otter.ai is a SaaS meeting transcription and notes tool that joins Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, summarize, and extract action items in real time. Pricing: free (600 min/mo, 30-min limit per conversation), $16.99/user/mo Pro (6,000 min/mo, 90-min limit), $30/user/mo Business (team admin controls). Transcription accuracy in clear English is 85-90%; it degrades noticeably with accents, background noise, or heavy technical jargon. Speaker identification works reliably after a few labeled sessions. OtterPilot auto-joins meetings as a visible bot participant — other participants see it in the attendee list. Reddit complaints center on the bot presence being disruptive in professional or client-facing meetings, the free tier 30-minute limit cutting off longer calls, and accuracy problems on technical terminology requiring manual correction. Compared to Fireflies.ai: Otter has a cleaner transcript editing interface and better speaker diarization; Fireflies has stronger CRM integration and cross-meeting search. Compared to Fathom (free for individuals): Fathom is hard to justify paying for over Otter for individual use.

Key Features

Real-time transcription
Meeting summaries
Action item extraction
Zoom/Meet/Teams integration
Speaker identification
Custom vocabulary

Basic

Free
  • 300 min/mo transcription
  • 30 min per conversation
  • AI summaries
Most Popular

Pro

$17/mo
  • 1200 min/mo
  • 90 min per conversation
  • Advanced search

Business

$30/mo
  • 6000 min/mo
  • Admin analytics
  • SSO

Pros

  • Excellent real-time transcription accuracy
  • Automatic meeting join for Zoom/Meet/Teams
  • AI summaries save hours of note-taking
  • Good speaker identification
  • Searchable meeting archive
  • Solid free tier

Cons

  • Accuracy drops with accents or poor audio
  • Free tier limited to 300 minutes
  • No offline transcription
  • Privacy concerns with recording meetings
  • Limited language support vs competitors
  • Can be disruptive joining meetings as a bot

Best For

  • Individual and small team meeting transcription and notes
  • Teams that prefer a clean transcript editing experience
  • English-language meetings with clear audio and minimal accents
  • Occasional recording without CRM sync requirements

Not Ideal For

  • Sales teams needing CRM sync — Fireflies.ai handles that better
  • Meetings with heavy accents or significant background noise

Potential Deal Breakers

  • Meeting bot is visible to all participants and can feel intrusive
  • Free tier 30-minute conversation limit cuts off longer meetings
  • Accuracy drops significantly with accents or domain-specific technical jargon

Data & Privacy

No
Sells Data
Opt-out
AI Training
US (AWS)
Data Location
Yes
Data Export
Yes
Data Deletion
Yes
GDPR

AI meeting transcription. Meeting audio and transcripts processed by AI. Otter states customer data is not used for model training on Business plans. Free tier terms are broader. Transcripts exportable. SOC 2 Type 2 certified.

Who Is This For?

Hands-on tested 2026-05

Signup Experience

Simple email or Google signup. Calendar integration setup takes a few minutes but the bot joins meetings automatically once configured.

For Home Users

Excellent for capturing meeting content without manual note-taking. Free 300 minutes monthly covers most casual users adequately.

For Business Users

Strong ROI for meeting-heavy teams. Speaker identification and searchable archives save significant time. Business plan adds admin controls needed at scale.

Our Verdict

Otter.ai is a solid meeting transcription tool with a cleaner editor than Fireflies. The free tier is genuinely useful for individuals. For sales teams that need CRM logging, Fireflies has better integrations. The bot being visible in meetings is the most consistent complaint across all tiers.

Editorial Rating:
4.0