Strapi vs PocketBase
Detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs
S
Strapi
Open-source headless CMS — design APIs fast and manage content easily
4.3
Editorial RatingP
PocketBase
Open-source backend in a single file — realtime database, auth, and file storage
4.5
Editorial RatingQuick Comparison
Rating
4.3
vs4.5
Starting Price
Free
vsFree
Pricing Model
freemium
vsfree
Feature
Strapi
PocketBase
Content type builder
REST & GraphQL
Role-based access
Plugin marketplace
Media library
i18n support
Embedded database
Realtime subscriptions
Built-in authentication
File storage
Admin dashboard
REST API
Strapi Pros
- Most popular open-source headless CMS
- Highly customizable with plugins
- Great developer experience
- Large community
Strapi Cons
- Can be resource-heavy for large sites
- Breaking changes between major versions
- Cloud plans are pricey
PocketBase Pros
- Single binary — incredibly easy to deploy
- Zero configuration needed
- Built-in auth, files, and realtime
- Perfect for MVPs and side projects
PocketBase Cons
- SQLite limits horizontal scaling
- Smaller ecosystem than Firebase/Supabase
- Not ideal for high-write workloads