Miro vs FigJam
Detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs
M
Miro
Online collaborative whiteboard for distributed teams
4.7
Editorial RatingQuick Comparison
Rating
4.7
vs4.5
Starting Price
Free
vsFree
Pricing Model
freemium
vsfreemium
Feature
Miro
FigJam
Infinite canvas
2,500+ templates
Real-time collaboration
Jira & Asana integration
Presentation mode
Guest access
Digital whiteboard
Sticky notes
Templates
AI features
Voting
Cursor chat
Miro Pros
- 60M+ users — the industry standard for remote workshops
- Enormous template library covering every workshop format
- Excellent Jira, Asana, Figma, and Slack integrations
- Real-time collaboration with voting and timer tools
- Works across any browser without installation
- Free tier genuinely useful for small team evaluation
Miro Cons
- Per-seat pricing adds up fast for large organizations
- Large boards get laggy with many elements and participants
- Free tier limited to 3 boards for ongoing work
- Can feel overwhelming for simple whiteboard needs
- Viewer-only seats still count toward costs in some configurations
- Feature breadth means a learning curve for new users
FigJam Pros
- Tight Figma integration for design teams
- Fast and responsive — feels great to use
- Excellent for workshops and retrospectives
- Good free tier with 3 boards
- AI features help structure brainstorms
FigJam Cons
- Only really useful if your team uses Figma
- Limited vs Miro for non-design teams
- Fewer templates than dedicated whiteboard tools