Logseq vs SiYuan
Detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs
L
Logseq
Open-source outliner for knowledge management
4.3
Editorial RatingS
SiYuan
Privacy-first local knowledge management with block-level references
4.5
Editorial RatingQuick Comparison
Rating
4.3
vs4.5
Starting Price
Free
vsFree
Pricing Model
free
vsfreemium
Feature
Logseq
SiYuan
Outliner-based editing
Bidirectional linking
Daily journals
Graph view
Open source
Local-first
Block-level references
Spaced repetition
E2E encrypted sync
Math and diagrams
Mobile apps
Logseq Pros
- Completely open source and free
- Powerful block-level references and embedding
- Excellent daily journaling workflow
- Local-first with privacy built in
- Active community
- Strong for interconnected note-taking
Logseq Cons
- Development pace slower than Obsidian
- Performance issues with large knowledge bases
- Outliner format not suitable for everyone
- Fewer plugins than Obsidian ecosystem
- Mobile apps less polished
- Database mode still maturing
SiYuan Pros
- Block-level referencing more granular than any competitor
- Spaced repetition built in for active learning
- End-to-end encrypted sync option for cross-device use
- Rich content support including math diagrams and code
- Desktop and mobile apps for all platforms
- Completely free for local use
SiYuan Cons
- Steeper learning curve than simpler note apps
- Block reference syntax takes time to master
- Cloud sync requires paid subscription
- Smaller community than Obsidian or Notion
- Interface can feel overwhelming for simple notes
- English documentation sometimes lags Chinese original