Keycloak vs Gitea
Detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs
K
Keycloak
Open-source identity and access management — self-hosted Auth0 alternative
4.2
Editorial RatingG
Gitea
Painless self-hosted Git service — lightweight GitHub alternative
4.4
Editorial RatingQuick Comparison
Rating
4.2
vs4.4
Starting Price
Free
vsFree
Pricing Model
free
vsfree
Feature
Keycloak
Gitea
Single Sign-On
SAML & OpenID Connect
Social login
User federation (LDAP/AD)
Admin console
Fine-grained authorization
Git hosting
Issue tracking
CI/CD Actions
Package registry
Code review
Low resource usage
Keycloak Pros
- Enterprise-grade identity management
- Backed by Red Hat
- Supports every auth protocol
- Massive adoption in enterprise
Keycloak Cons
- Java-based — heavier resource usage
- Complex initial configuration
- Documentation can be overwhelming
Gitea Pros
- Extremely lightweight — runs on a Raspberry Pi
- GitHub-compatible CI/CD Actions
- Easy single-binary install
- Active community
Gitea Cons
- Smaller ecosystem than GitHub/GitLab
- Fewer built-in DevOps features
- No cloud-hosted option from Gitea team