FigJam vs Miro
Detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs
M
Miro
Online collaborative whiteboard for distributed teams
4.7
Editorial RatingQuick Comparison
Rating
4.5
vs4.7
Starting Price
Free
vsFree
Pricing Model
freemium
vsfreemium
Feature
FigJam
Miro
Digital whiteboard
Sticky notes
Templates
AI features
Voting
Cursor chat
Infinite canvas
2,500+ templates
Real-time collaboration
Jira & Asana integration
Presentation mode
Guest access
FigJam Pros
- Tight Figma integration for design teams
- Fast and responsive — feels great to use
- Excellent for workshops and retrospectives
- Good free tier with 3 boards
- AI features help structure brainstorms
FigJam Cons
- Only really useful if your team uses Figma
- Limited vs Miro for non-design teams
- Fewer templates than dedicated whiteboard tools
Miro Pros
- 60M+ users — the industry standard for remote workshops
- Enormous template library covering every workshop format
- Excellent Jira, Asana, Figma, and Slack integrations
- Real-time collaboration with voting and timer tools
- Works across any browser without installation
- Free tier genuinely useful for small team evaluation
Miro Cons
- Per-seat pricing adds up fast for large organizations
- Large boards get laggy with many elements and participants
- Free tier limited to 3 boards for ongoing work
- Can feel overwhelming for simple whiteboard needs
- Viewer-only seats still count toward costs in some configurations
- Feature breadth means a learning curve for new users