Directus vs Stirling-PDF
Detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs
D
Directus
Open-source headless CMS and data platform
4.5
Editorial RatingS
Stirling-PDF
Self-hosted PDF toolkit with 60+ tools
4.6
Editorial RatingQuick Comparison
Rating
4.5
vs4.6
Starting Price
Free
vsFree
Pricing Model
freemium
vsfreemium
Feature
Directus
Stirling-PDF
REST & GraphQL API
Role-based access
File management
Webhooks
Custom dashboards
Merge & split PDFs
OCR text recognition
Digital signatures
Format conversion
Batch processing API
Self-hosted (Docker)
Directus Pros
- Database-agnostic
- Beautiful admin UI
- Strong API
- Active community
Directus Cons
- Cloud plans expensive
- Learning curve for complex setups
- Self-hosting requires maintenance
Stirling-PDF Pros
- 60+ PDF operations in one tool
- Dead simple Docker deployment
- Documents never leave your server
- Active development (76K GitHub stars)
- API-first for workflow automation
- Ultra-lite image available (1GB RAM)
Stirling-PDF Cons
- Text editing still in alpha
- Not a full Adobe Acrobat replacement
- OCR requires full Docker image
- No real-time collaborative editing
- Enterprise features are newer
- No native mobile app