Penpot vs Principle
Detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs
P
Principle
Animated design for interactive interfaces
4.3
Editorial RatingQuick Comparison
Rating
4.4
vs4.3
Starting Price
Free
vs$129
Pricing Model
free
vspaid
Feature
Penpot
Principle
Vector editing
Real-time collaboration
Prototyping
Components
Open source
Self-hosting
Animation Design
Interactive Prototyping
Auto-Animate
Driver-Based Animation
Component Reuse
Sketch and Figma Import
Penpot Pros
- Fully open source with self-hosting option
- No cost with all features included
- SVG-native format (no proprietary lock-in)
- Figma-like interface reduces learning curve
- Active development improving rapidly
- No Figma/Adobe file format restrictions
Penpot Cons
- Performance noticeably slower than Figma
- Feature gap remains vs industry leaders
- Smaller plugin/component ecosystem
- Some advanced Figma features still missing
- Cloud collaboration less reliable than Figma
Principle Pros
- Best-in-class animation timeline editor
- One-time purchase with no subscription
- Auto-animate makes transitions effortless
- Drivers enable complex interactive prototypes
- Lightweight and fast performance
- Great for demonstrating micro-interactions
Principle Cons
- Mac only with no Windows or web version
- Limited collaboration features
- No design tools only prototyping
- Smaller community than Figma or Framer
- Updates have slowed over time
- Cannot create production-ready code exports